• Charles Oakley: LeBron Is a Better Athlete, Can Do More Than Jordan

    by FootBasket on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

    Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

    Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

    Former NBA enforcer Charles Oakley hasn’t been the biggest fan of today’s NBA. He’ll blast it any chance he gets.

    Oakley isn’t afraid to speak his mind on anything regarding the NBA, but there’s one thing he has done: he’s changed his tune on how he views LeBron James. This comes on the heels of the Michael Jordan/James debate.

    Back in 2011, Oakley was critical of James. Not as a player, but a few aspects of his game.

    “I wouldn’t put [James and Jordan] in the same conversation,” he said then, via HOOPSWORLD. “It took a while for Michael to win championships too, but they have a different swagger, a different demeanor. If I would compare anybody to Michael Jordan, it would be Kobe Bryant. Point blank. I know LeBron well; he don’t have what Michael have so I’m not even gonna discuss that one.

    “To be a superstar [LeBron] has to go back to his fundamentals… work on his post game, work off the ball.”

    Oakley never said he didn’t like the guy, he just said he needed to work on a few things to reach a higher level, if that’s possible. If you look at James’ game now, you can see that he worked on a few things and it resulted in a championship.

    Oakley has taken notice of the changes in the King’s game and he went on to say that the Miami Heat star forward can do more on the court than His Airness.

    “I appreciate him as a person, a mindset out on the court to perfect the game,” Oakley told The Palm Beach Post. “Everybody’s criticizing him about this, about that, and he lets his game get better every year, and he got smarter every year, no matter what no one said. He let his game grow with him. The man is the best player, ain’t never gonna be a player like that. He’s going to go down as a top three player in the history of basketball.

    “He might not have had a lot of big numbers, but he would have made it. If you can get 26 (points) instead of 27, it’s the same thing. But he’s a guy you want to play with, no matter level what he played. If he played 40 years ago, he understands basketball. He’s one of the smartest guys I’ve seen in this game, probably go down as one of the smartest guys. He dictates offense, defense, he can do it all.

    “It’s a different debate. I ask everybody, who’s the best between Magic and LeBron? Everyone says Michael’s greatest. But, OK, well, we’ll give him his props. But LeBron is a better athlete, and he can do more than Michael on the basketball court. Michael is finisher, a great shooter, and it is what it is.”

    Say what you will, but it’s difficult to argue Oakley’s point. James is too multi-skilled to not have been a successful player in the older generations of the game. He might not have dominated like he does now, but who in the history of this league had James’ skill-set with his kind of size and strength? There’s not many.

    I’m not going to get into the Jordan/LeBron debate. They’re both great players that played in different eras. You can’t really compare the two, but to most, in order to get into Jordan’s stratosphere, James will need to win some more championships. Until then, most will not put James in Jordan’s class.

    Share This:

    discussion by You May Also Like